
AI models have shown remarkable progress in solving complex puzzles, yet they continue to struggle with certain intelligence tests that humans find intuitive. Studies from Columbia University and others reveal that while AI can solve puzzles like the New York Times Connections with near perfection, they falter with spatial reasoning and visual puzzles. These challenges highlight the nuanced differences between human and machine cognition, particularly in abstract reasoning and adaptability. This exploration underscores both the rapid advancement of AI and its current limitations in mimicking human thought processes.
Read originalEarlier coverage that leads up to this article, and what followed. Lines connect each piece to the closest one after it, converging here.
WIRED AI · May 6, 2026 · Related
AI Explained · May 20, 2026 · Related
Microsoft Research · May 27, 2026 · Related
MIT News AI · June 3, 2026 · Related
Matt Wolfe · June 25, 2026 · Related
WIRED AI · July 15, 2026 · Related
Microsoft Research · August 12, 2026 · Related
MIT Technology Review AI · August 18, 2026 · Related
TechCrunch AI · September 10, 2026 · Related
Hugging Face Blog · October 3, 2026 · Background
MIT Technology Review AI · October 19, 2026 · Related
The AI Daily Brief · October 21, 2026 · Related
TechCrunch AI · October 23, 2026 · Background
© Cole MedinAnthropic’s latest research exposes a quiet but dangerous flaw in agentic workflows: experts follow AI recommendations 86% of the time, often adopting the agent's reasoning as their own. This isn't just about accuracy; it's about cognitive capture, where human oversight dissolves into passive compliance. The study shows that even when users believe they are steering, the agent’s framing dictates the outcome. Practitioners must now actively counter this bias by forcing agents to justify deviations or prototype alternatives before committing to a path. This shift demands a new discipline in how we interact with coding assistants. We can no longer assume our intent drives the result; the model's suggestion often becomes the default truth. The real work is ensuring we remain the architects, not just the approvers.
© WIRED AICisco Talos has uncovered a new infostealer strain that actively uses commercial LLMs to profile victims and prioritize high-value targets. Dubbed Volta-Autodoxer, the malware collects credentials and browsing data, then feeds this into models like Claude Opus 4.6 via OpenRouter to generate structured intelligence dossiers. This marks a shift from passive data theft to active, AI-driven triage, allowing attackers to bypass guardrails with fallback models like Kimi K2 or Gemini. The capability foreshadows a future where lower-sophistication criminals can execute sophisticated, targeted attacks at scale.
© Matt WolfeOpenAI researchers published findings disproving the Exponential Time Hypothesis, a major result in computational complexity theory.