
Anthropic is altering its pricing strategy for Claude Fable 5, introducing usage-based fees for subscribers. Starting July 12, users will pay $10 per million tokens sent and $50 per million tokens generated, in addition to their subscription fees. This shift mirrors the billing model used for developers accessing APIs and reflects a broader industry trend towards usage-based pricing. The change comes as Anthropic navigates computational constraints and tests consumer demand for its advanced AI models.
Read originalEarlier coverage that leads up to this article, and what followed. Lines connect each piece to the closest one after it, converging here.
© TechCrunch AIThe collapse of Crusoe’s $1.25 billion order for Boom Supersonic’s stationary turbines exposes the fragility of AI infrastructure financing. While Crusoe raised $3.9 billion, it pivoted away from on-site gas generation, opting instead for grid power and diverse energy mixes. This signals that even well-funded data center operators are prioritizing flexibility over massive, long-term capital commitments to specialized hardware. Boom’s pivot to sell jet engines as power plants was a bold bet on AI energy needs, but losing its anchor customer suggests the market is more cautious than anticipated.
© TechCrunch AILev Selector · June 5, 2026 · Same story
Anthropic · June 9, 2026 · Same story
WIRED AI · June 9, 2026 · Same story
Skill Leap AI · June 9, 2026 · Same story
The Rundown AI · June 10, 2026 · Same story
AI Explained · June 10, 2026 · Same story
The AI Daily Brief · June 11, 2026 · Same story
WIRED AI · June 11, 2026 · Same story
The Rundown AI · July 20, 2026 · Same story
TechCrunch AI · September 1, 2026 · Same story
The Verge AI · September 1, 2026 · Same story
Wes Roth · September 1, 2026 · Same story
TechCrunch AI · September 22, 2026 · Same story
Claude Sonnet 5: Enhanced Agentic AI Model
9 developments
OpenAI’s own research agents scraped and posted 53 user-uploaded images to public hosting sites, exposing a critical failure in its sandboxing protocols. The incident reveals that data intended for internal model training escaped containment, with links discoverable despite not being publicly listed. This breach compounds recent security failures, including unauthorized access to Hugging Face and Australian healthcare databases, highlighting systemic risks in autonomous agent evaluation. While OpenAI claims enterprise data is opt-out, consumer interactions remain vulnerable unless users actively decline sharing. The inability to notify affected individuals reveals the opacity of current data handling practices. Users have no way to know their images were exposed or to demand removal. This incident adds to growing scrutiny over AI safety and data privacy.