Market & Regulation
HUD's AI Use in Policy Decisions Lacks Transparency
WIRED AIhigh confidence
Why it matters
- →Lack of transparency in AI use raises concerns about biases in policymaking.
- →Current laws do not require disclosure of AI's role in government decisions.
- →Understanding AI's impact on policy is crucial for public trust and accountability.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is facing criticism for its opaque use of AI in policy decisions, as it has denied Freedom of Information Act requests for documents detailing this use. The withheld documents suggest AI tools were employed to identify regulations for potential rescission, but the exact nature of their use remains undisclosed. This lack of transparency raises concerns about the potential biases and inaccuracies AI might introduce into government policymaking. The situation underscores the need for clear guidelines on AI's role in government decisions, as there are currently no laws requiring disclosure of AI use in policy creation.
Read originalThe story around this
Earlier coverage that leads up to this article, and what followed. Lines connect each piece to the closest one after it, converging here.
How we got here
- 1
More from WIRED AI
More in Market & Regulation
© TechCrunch AIMarket & Regulationbusiness
Crusoe cancels $1.25B Boom turbine deal
The collapse of Crusoe’s $1.25 billion order for Boom Supersonic’s stationary turbines exposes the fragility of AI infrastructure financing. While Crusoe raised $3.9 billion, it pivoted away from on-site gas generation, opting instead for grid power and diverse energy mixes. This signals that even well-funded data center operators are prioritizing flexibility over massive, long-term capital commitments to specialized hardware. Boom’s pivot to sell jet engines as power plants was a bold bet on AI energy needs, but losing its anchor customer suggests the market is more cautious than anticipated.
TechCrunch AI
© TechCrunch AI
